Share on bsky
Western culture has developed a surprisingly sophisticated vocabulary for softening the reality of harm.
Instead of calling something what it is…bullying…we rename it, reframe it, and normalize it. The language we use doesn’t just describe behaviour; it protects it.
When it comes to what is often framed as “male” behavior, we hear terms like hazing, locker room talk, roasting, ribbing, toughening up, or just banter. These phrases suggest bonding, humour, or resilience-building. But in practice, they often involve humiliation, coercion, boundary violations, and emotional suppression. Young men, in particular, are taught to endure discomfort without protest…to laugh when they are hurt, to stay silent when they are targeted.
The cost is profound: disconnection from emotional truth, increased aggression, and a culture where harm is both delivered and tolerated as a rite of belonging.
On the side of what is often framed as “female” behaviour, the language shifts but the pattern remains. Terms like cattiness, mean girls, gossip, passive-aggressive behaviour, or social exclusion are used to minimize relational aggression. These behaviours can be deeply wounding…undermining someone’s sense of belonging, safety, and self-worth through subtle but persistent social manipulation. Because it is less overt, it is often dismissed as trivial or inevitable, rather than recognized as a legitimate form of harm.
What unites all of these is not gender, but permission. When we label harmful behaviour in softer, culturally acceptable ways, we remove accountability. We teach people, consciously or not, that this is just “how things are.”
That enduring harm is normal.
That causing harm is excusable.
But bullying, whether loud or quiet, physical or relational, joking or strategic, has real consequences. It shapes nervous systems, reinforces hierarchies, and perpetuates cycles of shame and dominance. It tells people they must harden themselves to belong, or risk exclusion.
If we want something different—for our children, our communities, ourselves—we have to start by telling the truth. Not everything that is normalized is harmless. And not everything that is called “just the way people are” should be accepted.
Changing the language is not about being overly sensitive. It is about being precise. Because once we name something accurately, we can no longer pretend we don’t see it.
~
Read 0 comments and reply